Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11054/906
Title: | Associations and clinical significance in meta-analysis: when are the deductions too presumptive? |
Authors: | MacFadyen, Robert J. |
Issue Date: | 2014 |
Publisher: | Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh |
Place of publication: | Edinburgh, Scotland |
Publication Title: | The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh |
Volume: | 44 |
Issue: | 2 |
Start Page: | 131 |
End Page: | 132 |
Abstract: | Commentary on the conclusions reached in a systematic review and meta-analyis of publications carried out over an approximately ten-year period from 2002-2012 looking at mortality after coronary presentation. The article discussed is Sorita, A., Ahmed A., Starr, S et al. (2014) Off hour presentation and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2014;348:f7393. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11054/906 |
Resource Link: | https://www.rcpe.ac.uk/Journal/associations-and-clinical-significance-metaanalysis-when-are-deductions-too-presumptive |
ISSN: | 1478-2715 |
Internal ID Number: | 00840 |
Health Subject: | AFTER HOURS CARE - ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATON COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS HEALTH POLICY HEALTH RESOURCES MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION |
Type: | Journal Article Article |
Appears in Collections: | Research Output |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RMacFadyen_Associations and clinical significance ....pdf | 179.84 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.