Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/40
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHurley, James C.en
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-16T03:54:45Zen
dc.date.available2012-10-16T03:54:45Zen
dc.date.issued1994en
dc.identifier.govdoc00027en
dc.identifier.issn0095-1137en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/40en
dc.description.abstractThe Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay is a sensitive method for detecting endotoxin. Using gramnegative (GN) bacteremia as the basis for comparison, concordance with endotoxemia in 45 studies could be expressed as an odds ratio. Calculation of summary odds ratios by the Mantel-Haenszel-Peto method indicated that the concordance of the results was no higher by the chromogenic LAL assay than by the gelation version, and the sensitivity was improved by only 11% (62 versus 51%). Endotoxemia was detected in 77 (68%) of 114 patients with bacteremia caused by an organism that was not a member of the family Enterobacteriaceae, whereas endotoxemia was detected in only 120 (45%) of 269 patients with bacteremia caused by a member of the family Enterobacteriaceae or an anaerobe (P < 0.001). This difference was also apparent for patients with GN bacteremia for whom a fatal outcome had been recorded. The prevalence of GN bacteremia in the tested population and the type of etiological agent are critical and previously unrecognized variables which affect the interpretation of the LAL test in patients with suspected sepsis.en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2012-10-16T03:54:45Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2012-10-16T03:52:32ZNo. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2012-10-16T03:54:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 1994en
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Microbiologyen
dc.relation.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC263953/en
dc.titleConcordance of endotoxemia with gram-negative bacteremia in patients with gram-negative sepsis: a meta-analysis.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.specifiedArticleen
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleJournal of Clinical Microbiologyen
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume32en
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue9en
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage2120en
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage2127en
dc.publisher.placeWashingtonen
dc.subject.healththesaurusENDOTOXEMIAen
dc.subject.healththesaurusGRAM NEGATIVE BACTEREMIAen
dc.subject.healththesaurusENDOTOXINSen
dc.subject.healththesaurusSEPSISen
dc.subject.healththesaurusLIMULUS TESTen
dc.subject.healththesaurusENTEROBACTERIACEAE INFECTIONSen
dc.subject.healththesaurusGRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIAL INFECTIONSen
dc.subject.healththesaurusHUMANSen
dc.subject.healththesaurusODDS RATIOen
dc.subject.healththesaurusPREVALENCEen
dc.subject.healththesaurusSENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITYen
dc.date.issuedbrowse1994-01-01en
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.