Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/3189
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSatheakeerthy, S.en_US
dc.contributorBeecher, M.en_US
dc.contributorBooth, A. E. C.en_US
dc.contributorStretton, B.en_US
dc.contributorKovoor, Joshuaen_US
dc.contributorGupta, A.en_US
dc.contributorEvans, S.en_US
dc.contributorHowson, S.en_US
dc.contributorLogan, J.en_US
dc.contributorQian, C.en_US
dc.contributorLin, Y.en_US
dc.contributorGao, C.en_US
dc.contributorChan, W. O.en_US
dc.contributorSorich, M. J.en_US
dc.contributorBrown, M. P.en_US
dc.contributorJeffree, R. L.en_US
dc.contributorBacchi, S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-29T08:15:18Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-29T08:15:18Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.govdoc03150en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/3189-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clinical registries are essential in oncology for monitoring the quality of patient care and supporting research. However, maintaining these registries is resource-intensive and can burden clinical staff. Technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) now offer the ability to automatically extract data from electronic medical records into registries, with the potential to lower costs and improve efficiency. Objective: To examine the practical opportunities and challenges of automating oncology registries, using key lessons from the partial automation of the Australian Brain Cancer Registry (ABCR). The innovation: This analysis draws on the ABCR project experience, detailing the use of technologies ranging from discrete data extraction to advanced AI. It outlines the multidisciplinary approach required and discusses key factors relevant to registry automation. What can be learnt from this case? Successful registry automation relies on close collaboration between clinicians, researchers and programmers. Human oversight remains essential, particularly when the AI is uncertain about specific data points. Key factors for effective automation include clearly defined data elements, strong communication among stakeholders, robust safeguards for patient privacy and planning for long-term sustainability and interoperability of the registry. It is also important to avoid introducing bias by over-prioritising data that are easiest to extract automatically. Conclusion: Automating cancer registries can reduce costs but requires thorough planning. The optimal approach may involve humans and machines working together. Implications for health information management practice: Giving early attention to data accuracy, patient privacy and the long-term sustainability of the registry is critical for long-term success.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Tyarna Brookes (tyarna.brookes@gh.org.au) on 2026-02-20T02:11:29Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2026-04-29T08:15:18Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2026-04-29T08:15:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2025en
dc.titleAutomating cancer registries: Pearls and pitfalls.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleHealth Information Management Journalen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume55en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage193en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage202en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusQUALITY IMPROVEMENTen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusREGISTRIESen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMEDICAL RECORDen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusHEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENTen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/18333583251377892en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.