Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2870
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorGriffith, A.en_US
dc.contributorSiemensma, Gemmaen_US
dc.contributorAnderson, A.en_US
dc.contributorSmith, A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-13T01:46:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-13T01:46:02Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.govdoc02904en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/2870-
dc.description.abstractHealth libraries play a critical role in supporting medical training in Australia. Accreditation is an important means of ensuring a program of study and the education provider suitably equips trainees with the knowledge, skills and professional attributes necessary to practice in the profession. This study identifies a lack of consistency and specificity in Australian medical colleges accreditation requirements as they pertain to health libraries. The recommended accreditation standard developed in this study provides a benchmark for training providers that will ensure consistency of access to high-quality library collections, services and spaces for all medical trainees. Accreditation standards from 52 medical colleges and associations supporting Australian medical training programs were reviewed. Information extracted from accreditation documents was entered into a working text spreadsheet. Data was organized under three key categories: Collections, Services and Space. Additional categories were added to record the use of the noun Library and expectations for journal access. A data extraction tool was created in Microsoft Excel to note the requirements of each provider for libraries and collections, services and spaces. The results of the content analysis highlight a lack of consistency in accreditation providers’ expectations for library collections, services and spaces. Most providers (87% n = 45) required host organizations to provide access to collections. Requirements for library space were mandated by 54% of providers (n = 28). Less than 50% of providers (n = 22) specified library services as requirements. This content analysis highlights the role of health libraries in supporting medical education, research and evidence-based practice. It also reinforces the need for improved specificity, consistency and clarity in accreditation requirements for health libraries in post-graduate medical training. The recommended benchmark accreditation standard developed in this study is a step toward addressing these issues and ensuring equity of access to library services and facilities for all medical trainees in Australia.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-12-30T04:21:39Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2025-01-13T01:46:02Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-01-13T01:46:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2024en
dc.titleA content analysis of health library support for Australian medical training programs.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleJournal of Hospital Librarianshipen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume24en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue4en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage283en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage293en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusACCREDITATIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusAUSTRALIAen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusHEALTH LIBRARIESen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusINFRASTRUCTUREen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMEDICAL EDUCATIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusLIBRARIANSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusTRAINING FACILITIESen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2024.2395759en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.