Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2780
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorGanes, Ananden_US
dc.contributorSunder, Priyaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-27T06:06:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-27T06:06:43Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.govdoc02731en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/2780-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims The study and practice of medicine are known to contribute to burnout in medical students and junior doctors. There is limited data on the degree of mental health burden for Australian medical students and doctors-in-training (DiT). This scoping review aims to explore the impact of medical training on the mental health of Australian medical students and DiT. Exploring the mental health landscape across different stages of training will help to establish putative factors underlying psychiatric comorbidities in this demographic. Methods The Joanna Brigs Institute (JBI) framework for scoping review was utilized, involving the Population/Concept/Context (PCC) criteria to identify the target population and develop the search strategy. Peer-reviewed articles, published in English from 2012 to 2022 focusing on Australian medical students' and doctors-in-training mental health were considered. Results Of the 177 articles identified, 24 studies were included in the review. The majority of the studies focused on DiT (n = 19) of which interns and residents were most well represented (n = 12) followed by surgical training (n = 5), with general practice (GP) (n = 2) and physician specialties (nil) being poorly represented. Most studies were quantitative (n = 18), with qualitative studies(n = 6) under represented. Common mental health themes identified were overall psychological distress, burnout, and depression/suicidal ideation with workplace harassment and discrimination being less well represented. Conclusions Australian DiT are not equally represented in the literature with how different specialty training pathways impact their mental health. Most studies were cross-sectional, preventing a detailed longitudinal assessment of burnout and work-associated psychological distress.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-07-08T05:34:39Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-11-27T06:06:43Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-11-27T06:06:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2024en
dc.titleA scoping review of mental health status in Australian medical students and doctors-in-training (DiT).en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleHealth Science Reportsen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume7en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue6en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpagee2214en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusDOCTORS-IN-TRAININGen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusINTERNSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusJUNIOR DOCTORSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMENTAL HEALTHen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusREGISTRARSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRESIDENTSen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2214en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.