Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2223
Title: Perceived Autonomy Support in Telerehabilitation by People With Chronic Respiratory Disease: A Mixed Methods Study.
Author: Cox, N.
Lee, J.
McDonald, C.
Mahal, A.
Alison, J.
Wootton, R.
Hill, C.
Zanaboni, P.
O'Halloran, P.
Bondarenko, J.
Macdonald, Heather
Barker, K.
Crute, Hayley
Mellerick, C.
Wageck, B.
Boursinos, H.
Lahham, A.
Nichols, A.
Czupryn, P.
Corbett, M.
Handley, E.
Burge, A.
Holland, A.
Issue Date: 2023
Publication Title: Chest
Volume: 163
Issue: 6
Start Page: 1410
End Page: 1424
Abstract: Background Autonomy-supportive health environments can assist patients in achieving behavior change and can influence adherence positively. Telerehabilitation may increase access to rehabilitation services, but creating an autonomy-supportive environment may be challenging. Research Question To what degree does telerehabilitation provide an autonomy-supportive environment? What is the patient experience of an 8-week telerehabilitation program? Study Design and Methods Individuals undertaking telerehabilitation or center-based pulmonary rehabilitation within a larger randomized controlled equivalence trial completed the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ; short form) to assess perceived autonomy support. Telerehabilitation participants were invited 1:1 to undertake semistructured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded thematically to identify major themes and subthemes. Results One hundred thirty-six participants (n = 69 telerehabilitation) completed the HCCQ and 30 telerehabilitation participants (42%) undertook interviews. HCCQ summary scores indicated that participants strongly agreed that the telerehabilitation environment was autonomy supportive, which was similar to center-based participants (HCCQ summary score, P = .6; individual HCCQ items, P ≥ .3). Telerehabilitation interview data supported quantitative findings identifying five major themes, with subthemes, as follows: (1) making it easier to participate in pulmonary rehabilitation, because telerehabilitation was convenient, saved time and money, and offered flexibility; (2) receiving support in a variety of ways, including opportunities for peer support and receiving an individualized program guided by expert staff; (3) internal and external motivation to exercise as a consequence of being in a supervised group, seeing results for effort, and being inspired by others; (4) achieving success through provision of equipment and processes to prepare and support operation of equipment and technology; and (5) after the rehabilitation program, continuing to exercise, but dealing with feelings of loss. Interpretation Telerehabilitation was perceived as an autonomy-supportive environment, in part by making it easier to undertake pulmonary rehabilitation. Support for behavior change, understanding, and motivation were derived from clinicians and patient-peers. The extent to which autonomy support translates into ongoing self-management and behavior change is not clear.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2223
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.12.023
Internal ID Number: 02265
Health Subject: AUTONOMY
COPD
INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE
MOTIVATION
PULMONARY REHABILITATION
QUALITATIVE
TELEHEALTH
TELERABILITATION
Type: Journal Article
Article
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.