Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2116
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorField, M.en_US
dc.contributorBuccheri, A.en_US
dc.contributorKing, O.en_US
dc.contributorBishop, Jaclyn L.en_US
dc.contributorWong Shee, Annaen_US
dc.contributorImran, D.en_US
dc.contributorJacobs, J.en_US
dc.contributorVersace, Vincenten_US
dc.contributorIsaacs, A.en_US
dc.contributorSutton, K.en_US
dc.contributorSourlos, N.en_US
dc.contributorMurphy, F.en_US
dc.contributorKennelly, M.en_US
dc.contributorWood, E.en_US
dc.contributorAlston, L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T05:05:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-20T05:05:04Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.govdoc02062en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/2116-
dc.description.abstractAims This commentary aims to describe a case of how meaningful co-design between rural health service leaders and a health service-embedded research unit can identify emerging research priorities and optimise translation. Context The challenges facing rural health services are unique, and the important role of health service leaders in the research response is increasingly recognised. Poorly-designed research can contribute to research waste through reduced applicability of results to rural communities, and an opportunity exists to increase research co-designed with rural health services through the involvement of research users during study planning. Approach In early 2020, leaders at a rural Victorian health service approached the embedded health service research unit to request research be conducted on an emerging issue: rural staff well-being in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. This was based on their concern regarding the lack of available COVID-19-specific evidence to inform organisational policy. In collaboration with the rural health service executive, a translation-focused study of staff well-being with nine rural Victorian health services was developed. Key co-design activities of the project included involving research end-users as study investigators and conducting formal stakeholder engagement regarding study design and outcomes. Conclusion Meaningful co-design of research with health services is a multifaceted process that can assist researchers and end-users alike in identifying and responding to emerging health issues. In the rural setting where there is a vital need for impactful health research, we recommend that researchers should consider employing co-design processes in order to minimise research waste and optimise the translatability of research findings.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2023-02-09T02:55:26Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2023-02-20T05:05:04Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-02-20T05:05:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2022en
dc.titleRural health service leaders co-design state-wide research addressing an emerging health issue: A case report.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleAustralian Journal of Rural Healthen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume30en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue6en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage884en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage890en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusCOVID-19en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusCO-DESIGNen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusHEALTH SERVICES RESEARCHen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusHEALTH STAFF WELLBEINGen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRURAL HEALTHen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12915en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.