Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2094
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorKarri, R.en_US
dc.contributorchen, Y.en_US
dc.contributorBurrell, A.en_US
dc.contributorPenny-Dimri, J.en_US
dc.contributorBroadley, T.en_US
dc.contributorTrapani, T.en_US
dc.contributorDeane, A.en_US
dc.contributorUdy, A.en_US
dc.contributorPlummer, M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T04:29:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-20T04:29:08Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.govdoc02084en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/2094-
dc.descriptionIncludes data from BHSen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective(s) To use machine learning (ML) to predict short-term requirements for invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19 admitted to Australian intensive care units (ICUs). Design A machine learning study within a national ICU COVID-19 registry in Australia. Participants Adult patients who were spontaneously breathing and admitted to participating ICUs with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from 20 February 2020 to 7 March 2021. Patients intubated on day one of their ICU admission were excluded. Main outcome measures Six machine learning models predicted the requirement for invasive ventilation by day three of ICU admission from variables recorded on the first calendar day of ICU admission; (1) random forest classifier (RF), (2) decision tree classifier (DT), (3) logistic regression (LR), (4) K neighbours classifier (KNN), (5) support vector machine (SVM), and (6) gradient boosted machine (GBM). Cross-validation was used to assess the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of machine learning models. Results 300 ICU admissions collected from 53 ICUs across Australia were included. The median [IQR] age of patients was 59 [50–69] years, 109 (36%) were female and 60 (20%) required invasive ventilation on day two or three. Random forest and Gradient boosted machine were the best performing algorithms, achieving mean (SD) AUCs of 0.69 (0.06) and 0.68 (0.07), and mean sensitivities of 77 (19%) and 81 (17%), respectively. Conclusion Machine learning can be used to predict subsequent ventilation in patients with COVID-19 who were spontaneously breathing and admitted to Australian ICUs.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2023-02-13T02:55:38Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2023-02-20T04:29:08Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-02-20T04:29:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2022en
dc.titleMachine learning predicts the short-term requirement for invasive ventilation among Australian critically ill COVID-19 patients.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.contributor.corpauthorSPRINT-SARI Australia Investigatorsen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titlePLOS Oneen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume17en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue10en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpagee0276509en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusCOVID-19en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusVENTILATIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusINTENSIVE CARE UNITen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276509en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.