Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2024
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorAhmed, Saad Bilalen_US
dc.contributorObieta, Alfredoen_US
dc.contributorSantos, Tamsinen_US
dc.contributorAhmad, Saaraen_US
dc.contributorIbrahim, Joseph E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-16T02:42:28Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-16T02:42:28Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.govdoc01960en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/2024-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Vocally disruptive behaviour is a common and difficult to treat condition in older residents with dementia. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions in its management in persons with dementia residing in a nursing home. Methodology: A systematic search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases and reference lists from relevant publications on various nonpharmacological approaches to manage vocally disruptive behaviour in nursing home residents. The method of appraisal was through the National Institutes of Health scoring for the Quality Assessment of controlled intervention studies. Inclusion criteria included residents of nursing homes over the age of 65 with dementia and disruptive vocalisation. Only randomised controlled trials published in English were included. Results: A total of 5,606 articles were identified, which cover 501 trials, of which 23 were selected. There were fourteen studies observed to have an impact of clinical and statistical significance with interventions including (i) a multidimensional approach with different nonpharmacological interventions, (ii) multisensory stimulation, (iii) staff education and training, (iv) personalised bathing, and (v) pain recognition and appropriate management. Seven studies demonstrated no observable effect whereas two showed worsening in vocally disruptive behaviour. Conclusions: Many aspects of vocally disruptive behaviour management are poorly understood. Limited empirical evidence supports the use of several nonpharmacological interventions to reduce it. There is more robust evidence to support the use of a tailored approach to management over the universal approach.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2022-11-25T04:30:18Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2022-12-16T02:42:28Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-12-16T02:42:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2022en
dc.titleEffects of nonpharmacological interventions on disruptive vocalisation in nursing home patients with dementia - a systematic review.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleFrontiers in Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume2en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage718302en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusDEMENTIAen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusDISRUPTIVE VOCALISATIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusINTERVENTIONSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusNURSING HOMESen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusSYSTEMATIC REVIEWen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.718302en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.