Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1991
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorKing, Oliviaen_US
dc.contributorWest, Emmaen_US
dc.contributorLee, Sarahen_US
dc.contributorGlenister, Kristenen_US
dc.contributorQuilliam, Claireen_US
dc.contributorWong Shee, Annaen_US
dc.contributorBeks, Hannahen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T02:17:15Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-25T02:17:15Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.govdoc01916en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1991-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Research capacity building (RCB) initiatives have gained steady momentum in health settings across the globe to reduce the gap between research evidence and health practice and policy. RCB strategies are typically multidimensional, comprising several initiatives targeted at different levels within health organisations. Research education and training is a mainstay strategy targeted at the individual level and yet, the evidence for research education in health settings is unclear. This review scopes the literature on research education programs for nurses and allied health professionals, delivered and evaluated in healthcare settings in high-income countries. Methods: The review was conducted systematically in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Eleven academic databases and numerous grey literature platforms were searched. Data were extracted from the included full texts in accordance with the aims of the scoping review. A narrative approach was used to synthesise findings. Program characteristics, approaches to program evaluation and the outcomes reported were extracted and summarised. Results: Database searches for peer-reviewed and grey literature yielded 12,457 unique records. Following abstract and title screening, 207 full texts were reviewed. Of these, 60 records were included. Nine additional records were identified on forward and backward citation searching for the included records, resulting in a total of 69 papers describing 68 research education programs. Research education programs were implemented in fourteen different high-income countries over five decades. Programs were multifaceted, often encompassed experiential learning, with half including a mentoring component. Outcome measures largely reflected lower levels of Barr and colleagues' modified Kirkpatrick educational outcomes typology (e.g., satisfaction, improved research knowledge and confidence), with few evaluated objectively using traditional research milestones (e.g., protocol completion, manuscript preparation, poster, conference presentation). Few programs were evaluated using organisational and practice outcomes. Overall, evaluation methods were poorly described. Conclusion: Research education remains a key strategy to build research capacity for nurses and allied health professionals working in healthcare settings. Evaluation of research education programs needs to be rigorous and, although targeted at the individual, must consider longer-term and broader organisation-level outcomes and impacts. Examining this is critical to improving clinician-led health research and the translation of research into clinical practice.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2022-08-17T01:26:32Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2022-10-25T02:17:15Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-10-25T02:17:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2022en
dc.titleResearch education and training for nurses and allied health professionals: a systematic scoping review.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleMedical Educationen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume22en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage385en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRESEARCH EDUCATIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRESEARCH CAPACITY BUILDINGen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusEVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICEen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusHEALTH SETTINGSen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03406-7en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.