Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1925
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSharlov, R.en_US
dc.contributorTaniar, D.en_US
dc.contributorPhan, T.en_US
dc.contributorBeare, R.en_US
dc.contributorSrikanth, V.en_US
dc.contributorMa, H.en_US
dc.contributorFarrell, T.en_US
dc.contributorWhite, C.en_US
dc.contributorWallace, E.en_US
dc.contributorDavies-Tuck, M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-01T06:36:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-01T06:36:13Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.govdoc01899en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1925-
dc.descriptionIncludes data from BHS and WHCGen_US
dc.description.abstractProblem Currently <1% of Australian women give birth at home. Background In Australia there are very few options for women to access public funded homebirth. Aim We aimed to use geo-mapping to identify the number of women eligible for homebirth in Victoria, based on the criteria of uncomplicated pregnancies and residing within 15–25 kms of suitable maternity services, to plan future maternity care options. Methods Retrospective study of births between 2015 and 2017 in Victoria, Australia. All women who were identified as having a low risk pregnancy at the beginning of pregnancy were included. The number of women within 15 and 25 km of a suitable Victorian public maternity hospital and catchment boundaries around each hospital were determined. Findings Between 2015 and 2017, 126,830 low risk women gave birth in Victoria, of whom half live within 25 km of seven Victorian hospitals. Currently, 2% of suitable women who live close to the current public homebirth models accessed them. Discussion We present a method to inform the expansion of maternity service options using Victoria as an example. On the basis of the maximum number of low risk women living close by, we have also identified the Victorian maternity services that would be most suitable for creation of public homebirth or low risk continuity of midwifery models. Conclusion This approach could can be used to plan other maternity care services.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2022-05-11T03:34:05Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2022-06-01T06:36:13Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-06-01T06:36:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2022en
dc.titleWhere do low risk women live relative to maternity services across Victoria? Expanding access to public homebirth models across Victoria.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleWomen and Birthen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume35en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpagee91en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpagee97en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusGEOMAPPINGen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusHOMEBIRTHen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMATERNITY CAREen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMODELS OF CAREen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.01.004en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.