Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1899
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorHoskins, W.en_US
dc.contributorTaylor, P.en_US
dc.contributorJacob, A.en_US
dc.contributorWijeratne, Shiranen_US
dc.contributorCampbell, Ianen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-14T23:34:29Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-14T23:34:29Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.govdoc01808en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1899-
dc.descriptionWimmera Health Care Groupen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Little published data exists documenting the reasons for and outcomes of colectomies in rural Australia. It remains unclear whether patient characteristics, diagnoses, complications and outcomes differ to metropolitan locations. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data for patients coded with International Classification of Diseases procedure code block 934 and 935 (colectomies) performed at Wimmera Health Care Group: Horsham Campus between July 2004 and July 2011. Records were additionally sought from transfer hospitals. Results: Two hundred thirty-eight colectomies were performed over the 7-year period: 164 for a colorectal cancer diagnosis, 74 for a non-colorectal cancer diagnosis. For the colorectal cancer colectomies, 80.5% were elective and 19.5% emergency. There were five (3.0%) intraoperative complications. Postoperatively, there were 16 (9.8%) surgical complications. There was a 3.7% return to theatre rate and a 3.0% unplanned readmission rate. There were no anastomotic leaks. The perioperative mortality rate was 5.5%. For the non-colorectal cancer colectomies, 85.1% were emergency and 14.9% elective. There were five (6.8%) intraoperative complications. Postoperatively, there were 14 (18.9%) surgical complications. There was a 12.2% return to theatre rate, a 5.4% unplanned readmission rate and three anastomotic leaks. The perioperative mortality rate was 10.8%. Conclusions: The outcomes and complications for colectomies appear similar to the accepted standard of surgery in other rural and metropolitan centres. Areas have been identified for improved surgical performance at Wimmera Health Care Group: Horsham Campus.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-12-15T05:01:58Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2022-02-14T23:34:29Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-02-14T23:34:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2013en
dc.titleColectomies performed at a rural Australian hospital: a 7-year analysis.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleAustralian Journal of Rural Healthen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume21en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue5en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage279en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage284en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusCLINICAL AUDITen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusCOLORECTAL CANCERen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusGENERAL SURGERYen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRURAL HEALTHen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12058.en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.