Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1895
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorLiu, Daviden_US
dc.contributorLee, Margareten_US
dc.contributorSpelman, Timen_US
dc.contributorMacIsaac, Christopheren_US
dc.contributorCade, Johnen_US
dc.contributorHarley, Nerinaen_US
dc.contributorWolff, Alanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-14T23:18:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-14T23:18:18Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.govdoc01813en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1895-
dc.descriptionWimmera Health Care Groupen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Inpatient VTE prophylaxis is underused. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the low-cost, multifaceted Australian National Inpatient Medication Chart (NIMC) intervention on improving the quality of VTE prophylaxis and reducing disease. The NIMC intervention incorporated (1) a VTE risk stratification and appropriate prophylaxis guidance tool, (2) a prophylaxis contraindication screening instrument, and (3) a prophylaxis prescription prompt. Methods Retrospective analysis of 2,371 consecutive medical and surgical admissions was performed at a regional referral hospital over 1 year both before and after the intervention. Outcomes measured included the frequency of prophylaxis use, timing of prophylaxis initiation, adherence of the prescribed prophylaxis regimen to guidelines, incidence of VTE disease, and prophylaxis-related complications. Results Following NIMC intervention, prophylaxis use increased from 52.7% to 66.5% in medical patients and from 77.5% to 89.1% in surgical patients (P < .001). This increase was still evident 12 months postintervention. After intervention, prophylaxis initiated on admission increased from 65.0% to 83.6% in medical patients and from 60.7% to 78.0% in surgical patients (P < .01); adherence rates to recommended guidelines increased from 55.6% to 71.0% in medical patients and from 53.6% to 75.6% in surgical patients (P < .01). More VTE risk factors independently triggered prophylaxis usage postintervention. The improved quality of prophylaxis did not significantly reduce VTE incidence (risk ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.48-1.62). The rate of prophylaxis-related complications remained similar before and after intervention. Conclusions The multifaceted NIMC intervention resulted in a sustained increase in appropriate and timely VTE prophylaxis in medical and surgical inpatients.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-12-20T03:55:50Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2022-02-14T23:18:18Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-02-14T23:18:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2012en
dc.titleMedication chart intervention improves inpatient thromboembolism prophylaxis.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleChesten_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume141en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue3en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage632en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage641en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMEDICATON CHARTen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusVTE PROPHYLAXISen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-3162en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.