Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1823
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorConroy, I.en_US
dc.contributorMooney, S.en_US
dc.contributorKavanagh, S.en_US
dc.contributorDuff, Michaelen_US
dc.contributorJakab, I.en_US
dc.contributorRobertson, K.en_US
dc.contributorFitzgerald, A.en_US
dc.contributorMccutchan, A.en_US
dc.contributorMadden, S.en_US
dc.contributorMaxwell, S.en_US
dc.contributorNair, S.en_US
dc.contributorOriganti, N.en_US
dc.contributorQuinless, A.en_US
dc.contributorMirowski-Allen, K.en_US
dc.contributorSewell, M.en_US
dc.contributorGrover, S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-30T22:43:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-30T22:43:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.govdoc01793en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1823-
dc.description.abstractBackground Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common condition which significantly impacts the quality of life and wellbeing of many women. Laparoscopy with histopathology is recommended for investigation of pelvic pain and identification of endometriosis with concurrent removal. Never-the-less, the association between endometriosis and pelvic pain is challenging, with endometriosis identified in only 30–50% of women with pain. Aims To explore the predictors for undergoing surgery, for identifying endometriosis and endometriosis severity in a cohort of women with CPP. Materials and Methods This study forms part of the Persistent Pelvic Pain project, a prospective observational cohort study (ANZCTR:ACTRN12616000150448). Women referred to a public gynaecology clinic with pain were randomised to one of two gynaecology units for routine care and followed for 36 months with 6-monthly surveys assessing demographics, medical history, quality of life, and pain symptoms measured on a Likert scale. Operative notes were reviewed and endometriosis staged. Results Of 471 women recruited, 102 women underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy, of whom 52 had endometriosis (n = 37 stage I–II; n = 15 Stage III–IV). Gynaecology unit, pelvic pain intensity and lower parity were all predictors of surgery (odds ratio (OR) 0.342; 95% CI 0.209–0.561; OR 1.303; 95% CI: 1.079–1.573; OR 0.767; 95% CI: 0.620–0.949, respectively). There were no predictors identified for endometriosis diagnosis and the only predictor of severity was increasing age (OR 1.155; 95% CI: 1.047–1.310). Conclusions Gynaecology unit and pain intensity were key predictors of undergoing laparoscopy; however, pain severity did not predict endometriosis diagnosis or staging. These findings indicate the need to review current frameworks guiding practice toward surgery for pelvic pain.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-11-23T00:16:57Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-11-30T22:43:39Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-11-30T22:43:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2021en
dc.titlePelvic pain: What are the symptoms and predictors for surgery, endometriosis and endometriosis severity.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology .en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume61en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue5en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage765en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage772en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusCHRONIC PELVIC PAINen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusENDOMETRIOSISen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusPAIN SCORESen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusQUALITY OF LIFEen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusREAL-WORLD STUDYen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13379en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.