Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1812
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorBishop, Jaclyn L.en_US
dc.contributorQuilliam, C.en_US
dc.contributorKing, R.en_US
dc.contributorWong Shee, Annaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-07T08:06:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-07T08:06:07Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.govdoc01749en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1812-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The risk of COVID-19 transmission from face-to-face activities means alternative ways to deliver community-based group health programs (‘group programs’) are needed. Allied health practitioners at two regional health services (knowledge-partners) and local researchers adopted an Integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) approach to review the evidence on delivering group programs with technology. This study captured knowledge-partner and researcher experiences of iKT. Method: A survey designed to explore the components of iKT was distributed to all knowledge-partners who participated in at least one iKT activity (n=25). Semi-structured interview invitations were extended to the same knowledge-partners and participating researchers (n=5). These interviews explored in depth the partnering process and perceived impact of iKT. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Findings: Six surveys and ten interviews were completed. Knowledge-partners and researchers viewed the iKT experience positively, with a strong shared urgency and purpose in answering a time-sensitive, practice relevant question. The language used by both knowledge-partners and researchers suggested that iKT was challenging to implement, due to knowledge-partner clinical workload and urgency of the research question. This resulted in a more consultative than integrated process, with greater perceived involvement by knowledge-partners in the earlier stages of iKT (shaping the research question, data collection) compared to later stages (interpreting the study findings/crafting messaging). Conclusion: Achieving fully integrated knowledge translation was challenging given the time-sensitive nature of the allied health evidence-practice gap, however the process was highly valued and beneficial for both knowledge-partners and researchers.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-08-27T05:20:33Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-10-07T08:06:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Jaclyn_Bishop_Claire_Quilliam_3_6.pdf: 569314 bytes, checksum: ea15053b4bf68366d9b75002b74079bb (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-10-07T08:06:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Jaclyn_Bishop_Claire_Quilliam_3_6.pdf: 569314 bytes, checksum: ea15053b4bf68366d9b75002b74079bb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021en
dc.titleBridging an allied health ‘know-do’ gap on delivering community-based group health programs with technology – an integrated knowledge translation approach.en_US
dc.typeConferenceen_US
dc.type.specifiedPresentationen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencedateAugust 9-12en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencename14th National Allied Health Conference (NAHC)en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceOnlineen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusALLIED HEALTHen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusHEALTH PROGRAMSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusTELEHEALTHen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusONLINEen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusCOMMUNITY BASEDen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Jaclyn_Bishop_Claire_Quilliam_3_6.pdf555.97 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.