Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1747
Title: Divergent and convergent attitudes and views of general practitioners and community pharmacists to collaboratively implement antimicrobial stewardship programs in Australia: a nationwide study.
Author: Sajal, K. Saha
Kong, David C. M.
Thursky, Karin
Mazza, Danielle
Issue Date: 2021
Publication Title: Antibiotics
Volume: 10
Issue: 1
Start Page: 47
Abstract: Setting up an interprofessional team for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) to improve the quality and safety of antimicrobial use in primary care is essential but challenging. This study aimed to investigate the convergent and divergent attitudes and views of general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) about AMS implementation and their perceived challenges of collaboration to design a GP–pharmacist collaborative AMS (GPPAS) model. Nationwide surveys of GPs and CPs across Australia were conducted January-October 2019. Chi square statistics and a theoretical framework were used for comparative analyses of quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. In total, 999 participants responded to the surveys with 15.4% (n = 386) response rates for GPs and 30.7% (n = 613) for CPs. GPs and CPs were aware about AMS however their interprofessional perceptions varied to the benefits of AMS programs. CPs indicated that they would need AMS training; significantly higher than GPs (GP vs. CP; 46.4% vs. 76.5%; p < 0.0001). GPs’ use of the Therapeutic Guideline Antibiotic was much higher than CPs (83.2% vs. 45.5%; p < 0.0001). No interprofessional difference was found in the very-limited use of patient information leaflets (p < 0.1162) and point-of-care tests (p < 0.7848). While CPs were more willing (p < 0.0001) to collaborate with GPs, both groups were convergent in views that policies that support GP–CP collaboration are needed to implement GPPAS strategies. GP–pharmacist collaborative group meetings (54.9% vs. 82.5%) and antimicrobial audit (46.1% vs. 86.5%) models were inter-professionally supported to optimise antimicrobial therapy, but an attitudinal divergence was significant (p < 0.001). The challenges towards GP–CP collaboration in AMS were identified by both at personal, logistical and organisational environment level. There are opportunities for GP–CP collaboration to improve AMS in Australian primary care. However, strengthening GP–pharmacy collaborative system structure and practice agreements is a priority to improve interprofessional trust, competencies, and communications for AMS and to establish a GPPAS model in future
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1747
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10010047
Internal ID Number: 01691
Health Subject: ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP
GP-PHARMACIST COLLABORATION
GPPAS MODEL
ATTITUDES
VIEWS
GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS
Type: Journal Article
Article
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
01691.pdfPublished by MDPI301.09 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.