Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1732
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorWynn, Jessen_US
dc.contributorJohns-Putra, Lydiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-23T00:13:54Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-23T00:13:54Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.govdoc01706en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1732-
dc.description.abstractObjectives To determine the factors associated with patients preferring the gender of their treating urologist in various clinical settings. Methods A total of 400 urology outpatients participated in a structured interview on the nature of their presenting complaint, perception of their complaint and the preference for the gender of their urologist in four specific scenarios of consultation, physical examination, office‐based procedure and surgery. Patients who expressed a gender preference received follow‐up telephone calls. Results A gender preference was expressed by 63 (15.8%), 108 (27.0%), 89 (22.3%) and 29 (7.3%) patients for the scenarios of consultation, physical examination, office‐based procedure and surgery, respectively. Patients were more likely to have a preference if they were female or had a condition they considered embarrassing, with most preferences being for a gender‐concordant urologist. Reasons included a previous negative experience and perceived gender‐specific treatment styles. Patients who subsequently saw a doctor of the opposite gender to their preference were more likely to change their mind if their clinical interaction was positive. Conclusions Female patients, those with a perceived embarrassing condition and patients undergoing examination or office‐based procedures are more likely to have a gender preference for their urologist, with a subsequent positive experience leading to patients discarding pre‐existing preferences. With improved understanding of how patient characteristics, perception of their condition and previous experiences can affect their choices in various clinical situations, urologists can better meet patient expectations and address barriers to healthcare in urology.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-05-14T01:44:18Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-07-23T00:13:54Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-07-23T00:13:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2021en
dc.titlePatient preference for urologist gender.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleInternational Journal of Urologyen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume28en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue2en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage170en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage175en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusHEALTHCARE UTILIZATIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusPATIENT PREFERENCEen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusUROLOGISTSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusGENDERen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14418en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.