Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1514
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDowson, Leslieen_US
dc.contributorBennett, Noleenen_US
dc.contributorBuising, Kirstyen_US
dc.contributorMarshall, Carolineen_US
dc.contributorFriedman, N. Deborahen_US
dc.contributorStuart, Rhonda L.en_US
dc.contributorKong, David C. M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-01T04:02:37Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-01T04:02:37Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.govdoc01474en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1514-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Since 2015 the Aged Care National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey has collected and reported data on antibiotic use in Australian aged care homes (ACHs) as part of the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care's Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Australia project. The objective of this study was to analyze this data source with regards to prescribing for urinary tract infections (UTIs) to improve the use of antibiotics. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed the 2016 and 2017 survey data. Antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract indications was compared with national guideline recommendations. Results: A total of 662 antibiotic prescriptions from 247 ACHs were analyzed. For all prophylactic antibiotics for UTI, 51.8% were prescribed for longer than 6 months, contrary to the guideline recommendation. Most antibiotics prescribed for treatment (71.6%) were for cystitis. Cefalexin was most frequently selected for treatment of cystitis, with 10.4% of these prescriptions being concordant with the recommendations. Prescribing additional daily doses of cefalexin occurred in 63.2% of prescriptions. Conclusions: Antimicrobial stewardship activities targeting UTI prophylaxis for durations longer than 6 months, and excessive daily doses of cefalexin to treat cystitis could yield significant reductions in unnecessary antibiotic consumption among Australian residents of ACHs.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2020-06-01T04:02:11Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2020-06-01T04:02:37Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2020-06-01T04:02:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2020en
dc.titleUrinary tract infections in Australian aged care homes: Antibiotic prescribing practices and concordance to national guidelines.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleAmerican Journal of Infection Controlen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume48en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue3en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage261en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage266en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusURINARY TRACT INFECTIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusUTIen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRESIDENTIAL CAREen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusNURSING HOMEen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusLONG-TERM CAREen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusANTIBACTERIAL AGENTSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusCYSTITISen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.034en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.