Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1431
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorRingin, Sarahen_US
dc.contributorBrown, Stephenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-16T03:51:39Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-16T03:51:39Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.govdoc01378en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1431-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is a common belief that a significant proportion of Victorian regional patients are still being referred to metropolitan Melbourne for melanoma management due to long standing referral pathways. All melanoma treatment options are now standard of care and available for patients in Ballarat. We sought to evaluate the incidence, referral method and melanoma management at Ballarat Health Services (BHS). Results are aimed to assist allocation of resources and determine if a multidisciplinary meeting for melanoma cases would be beneficial. Method: Retrospective data was collected from electronic BHS clinical records between 2010-2017 capturing demographic and pathologic information. Analysed data demonstrated 1772 skin cancer presentations with 17.25% being melanoma cases. Results: Patients presenting to BHS with a melanoma had a median age of 66.5, 61% male and 69% resided in the Ballarat region. Only 77% of patients had a written referral, the majority from general practitioners (58%) with merely 74% diagnosed with a melanoma on arrival. The median time between referral without a diagnosis to a melanoma diagnosis was 44 days. Surgical management most commonly involved a wide local excision and 15% of presentations required oncological treatment at BHS. 6% of patients presented with metastatic disease post a previous melanoma removal and 12% of patients died from metastatic melanoma. BHS referred 3% of cases to metropolitan hospitals whilst 8% were referred to BHS from metropolitan hospitals for continued care. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate challenges do exist in providing gold standard melanoma care. Triaging appointments is made difficult without a melanoma diagnosis on arrival. 8% of transfers to BHS may indicate an even greater number of referrals to metropolitan Melbourne, many of which may be unnecessary. This highlights the need for community referral education, continuation of resources and a melanoma specific multidisciplinary meeting to discuss complex cases being managed at BHS.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2019-08-15T02:56:28Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Melanoma Poster 2.pdf: 899513 bytes, checksum: 83b94f5681843e74b753d06429b9932e (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2019-10-16T03:51:39Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Melanoma Poster 2.pdf: 899513 bytes, checksum: 83b94f5681843e74b753d06429b9932e (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-10-16T03:51:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Melanoma Poster 2.pdf: 899513 bytes, checksum: 83b94f5681843e74b753d06429b9932e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019en
dc.titleMelanoma incidence and pathways of management at Ballarat Health Services.en_US
dc.typeConferenceen_US
dc.type.specifiedPosteren_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate14 - 16 Augusten_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameMedical Oncology Group of Australia: Annual Scientific Meetingen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceCanberraen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMELANOMA TREATMENT OPTIONSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMELANOMA MANAGEMENTen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusREFERRAL PATHWAYSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMULTIDISCIPLINARY MEETINGSen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
Melanoma Poster 2.pdfConference Poster878.43 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.