Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1411
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorGoulopoulos, Anneen_US
dc.contributorRofe, Oliviaen_US
dc.contributorKong, David C. M.en_US
dc.contributorMaclean, Andrewen_US
dc.contributorO'Reilly, Maryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-14T09:07:43Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-14T09:07:43Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.govdoc01392en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1411-
dc.description.abstractAbstract Objective To explore the attitudes and beliefs of Australian ED clinicians towards antimicrobial stewardship in the ED. Methods Semi‐structured one‐to‐one interviews were conducted with ED clinicians between March and October 2015. Participants were identified via purposive and snowball sampling. Questionnaires were developed using the literature. Interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis via the framework approach. Two researchers coded independently, with one using QSR International's NVivo 10 software and the other manually. Emergent themes were identified and classified. Results Twenty‐two clinicians (eight doctors, eight nurses and six pharmacists) from seven institutions participated. Participants were aware and concerned about antimicrobial resistance. Clinicians were divided based on their opinion on whether antimicrobials are prescribed appropriately and judiciously in the ED, with many perceiving prescribing to be inappropriate. Prior knowledge of the term ‘Antimicrobial Stewardship’ was demonstrated by doctors and pharmacists, with a relative lack of awareness by nurses. Four main themes were identified as both barriers and facilitators to antimicrobial stewardship in the ED: individual healthcare provider, resource, organisational and cultural. Uncertainty of diagnosis, time and resource pressures, reliance on previous experience and lack of access to expert opinion were perceived barriers. To facilitate appropriate prescribing, clinicians emphasised the need for routine education and feedback, adequate staffing, robust guidelines, senior medical clinician advocacy and multidisciplinary support. Conclusions Australian ED clinicians were aware of antimicrobial resistance. Many perceive injudicious antimicrobial use as problematic. Consideration of ED clinicians’ perceived barriers and facilitators might enhance implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in EDs.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2019-10-10T00:54:31Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2019-10-14T09:07:43Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-10-14T09:07:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2019en
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13251en_US
dc.titleAttitudes and beliefs of Australian emergency department clinicians on antimicrobial stewardship in the emergency department: A qualitative study.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleEmergency Medicine Australasiaen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume31en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue5en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage787en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage796en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusANTIBACTERIAL AGENTSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIPen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusATTITUDEen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusEMERGENCY SERVICEen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusHOSPITALen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.