Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1281
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorFoo, Michelleen_US
dc.contributorMaingard, Julianen_US
dc.contributorPhan, Kevinen_US
dc.contributorLim, Reubenen_US
dc.contributorChandra, Ronil V.en_US
dc.contributorLee, Michael J.en_US
dc.contributorAsadi, Hameden_US
dc.contributorKuan Kok, Hongen_US
dc.contributorBrooks, Marken_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-21T03:19:26Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-21T03:19:26Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.govdoc01229en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1281-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction As interventional radiology (IR) adopts an increasingly pivotal role within therapeutic medicine, it is essential that medical students gain exposure to IR so as future doctors, they can fulfil the growing demand for interventional radiologists (IRs) and make appropriate referrals to IRs. Nonetheless, several international studies have reported no or little representation of IR in medical schools. Our study aims to assess the current awareness, exposure, knowledge and attitudes about IR among Australian medical students, so as to provide preliminary data on whether IR teaching in Australian medical schools needs improvement. Methods A prospective cross‐sectional study was conducted via web‐based and in‐person distribution of a voluntary, anonymous questionnaire. Results A total of 237 complete responses were received from approximately 1400 clinical‐based students (17% response rate); 38% of respondents had never witnessed an IR procedure, 39% witnessed 1–2 and the remainder, 3–5. Few students reported adequate teaching or knowledge in IR (7% and 5% respectively). Of the 32% of the students considering a career in IR, males predominated (25% of females vs. 59% of males, OR = 0.48, 95%, CI = 0.27–0.83, P = 0.008). Most students agree that IR should be in the university curriculum (59%) and is key to improving healthcare (74%). Senior students were more likely to report adequate teaching (P < 0.001) and believe that IR teaching is important (P = 0.001). Conclusions Australian medical students have a strong appreciation for IR despite having suboptimal teaching, exposure and knowledge in IR. In order to complement and sustain the rapid uptake of IR techniques in modern medicine, university curricula require a greater focus on IR.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2019-02-06T04:58:37Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2019-02-21T03:19:26Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-02-21T03:19:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2018en
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12764en_US
dc.titleAustralian students' perspective on interventional radiology education: A prospective cross‐institutional study.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology.en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume62en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage758en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage763en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusINTERVENTIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusNEUROINTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGYen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusNON-VASCULAR INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGYen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusQUALITY ASSURANCEen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusVASCULAR INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGYen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.