Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1275
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorYeoh, J.en_US
dc.contributorAndrianopoulos, Nicken_US
dc.contributorYudi, M.en_US
dc.contributorHorrigan, M.en_US
dc.contributorHorrigan, S.en_US
dc.contributorAjani, A.en_US
dc.contributorO'Brien, J.en_US
dc.contributorBrennan, A.en_US
dc.contributorProimos, G.en_US
dc.contributorPicardo, S.en_US
dc.contributorFreeman, M.en_US
dc.contributorOqueli, Ernestoen_US
dc.contributorSebastian, M.en_US
dc.contributorReid, C.en_US
dc.contributorFarouque, O.en_US
dc.contributorClark, D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-21T02:26:47Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-21T02:26:47Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.govdoc01252en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1275-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Drug-eluting stents (DES) were introduced in Australia in 2002. Initial use was restricted to high-restenosis-risk patients, due to cost and late stent thrombosis concerns, particularly the first-generation type. This study reviewed the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) experience of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES to examine trends, outcomes, and compare the long-term morality of first-generation to later-generation stent types. Method: Consecutive patients who underwent DES PCI from the MIG registry between 2005 and 2017 were analysed with yearly comparison. National Death Index (NDI) linkage was used to determine 5-year mortality and for Cox proportional hazards modelling. Results: A total of 15,329 procedures were captured. Major trends are shown below. Twelve-month target vessel revascularisation (available until 2011) was 3.56% compared to 5.75% in 2005 (p = 0.09). Five-year mortality (available until 2012) was 12.1% compared to 12.8% in 2005 (p = 0.25). There was no difference in long-term mortality between first-generation and later-generation DES (22.2% vs 23.6%, p = 0.86). First-generation DES was not an independent predictor of long-term mortality (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.91–1.36, p = 0.30). Conclusion: Uptake of DES was slow, but they are now almost universally recommended. There was no evidence of higher long-term mortality with first-generation DES in this Australian multi-centre registry.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2019-02-13T05:12:24Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2019-02-21T02:26:47Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-02-21T02:26:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2018en
dc.titleThe journey of drug-eluting stents: a multi-centre Australian Registry Review.en_US
dc.typeConferenceen_US
dc.type.specifiedPresentationen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencedateAugust 2-5then_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencename66th Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Annual Scientific Meeting, the International Society for Heart Research Australasian Section Annual Scientific Meeting and the 12th Annual Australia and New Zealand Endovascular Therapies Meeting.en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceBrisbane, Queenslanden_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusDRUG ELUTING STENTSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusHIGH RESTENOSIS RISKen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusPERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.