Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/672
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, Harryen
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorBlombery, Peteren
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Reneaen
dc.contributor.authorWheatley, Daviden
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-28T00:31:05Zen
dc.date.available2015-04-28T00:31:05Zen
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.govdoc00650en
dc.identifier.issn1477-9560en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/672en
dc.description.abstractArticle includes data from Ballarat Health Services. Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major health and financial burden. VTE impacts health outcomes in surgical and non-surgical patients. VTE prophylaxis is underutilized, particularly amongst high risk medical patients. We conducted a multicentre clinical audit to determine the extent to which appropriate VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients could be improved via implementation of a multifaceted nurse facilitated educational program. Methods: This multicentre clinical audit of 15 Australian hospitals was conducted in 2007-208. The program incorporated a baseline audit to determine the proportion of patients receiving appropriate VTE prophylaxis according to best practice recommendations issued by the Australian and New Zealand Working Party on the Management and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (ANZ-WP recommendations), followed by a 4-month education intervention program and a post intervention audit. The primary endpoint was to compare the proportion of patients being appropriately managed based on their risk profile between the two audits. Results: A total of 8774 patients (audit 1; 4399 and audit 2; 4375) were included in the study, most (82.2% audit 1; and 81.0% audit 2) were high risk based on ANZ-WP recommendations. At baseline 37.9% of high risk patients were receiving appropriate thromboprophylaxis. This increased to 54.1% in the post intervention audit (absolute improvement 16%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.7%, 20.5%). As a result of the nurse educator program, the likelihood of high risk patients being treated according to ANZ-WP recommendations increased significantly (OR 1.96; 1.62, 2.37). Conclusion: Utilization of VTE prophylaxis amongst hospitalized medical patients can be significantly improved by implementation of a multifaceted educational program coordinated by a dedicated nurse practitioner.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2015-04-28T00:29:50Z No. of bitstreams: 1 thrombosis journal.pdf: 2180416 bytes, checksum: d7dff588d355912087352b36a623be9a (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2015-04-28T00:31:05Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 thrombosis journal.pdf: 2180416 bytes, checksum: d7dff588d355912087352b36a623be9a (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-04-28T00:31:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 thrombosis journal.pdf: 2180416 bytes, checksum: d7dff588d355912087352b36a623be9a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011en
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.relation.urihttp://www.thrombosisjournal.com/content/9/1/7en
dc.titleVenous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.specifiedArticleen
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleThrombosis Journalen
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume9en
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1en
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage7en
dc.subject.healththesaurusVENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISMen
dc.subject.healththesaurusPROPHYLAXISen
dc.subject.healththesaurusNURSE DIRECTEDen
dc.date.issuedbrowse2011-01-01en
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
thrombosis journal.pdfok via sherpa romeo to add2.13 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.