Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/2264
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorBeks, H.en_US
dc.contributorMitchell, F.en_US
dc.contributorCharles. J.en_US
dc.contributorWong Shee, Annaen_US
dc.contributorMcNamara, Kevinen_US
dc.contributorVersace, Vincenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-02T00:52:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-02T00:52:53Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.govdoc02318en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/2264-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Globally, primary care organisations responded rapidly to COVID-19 physical distancing requirements through the adoption of telehealth to maintain the delivery of health care to communities. In Australia, temporary Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth items were introduced in March 2020 to enable the provision of telehealth services in the primary care setting. These changes included funding for two modes of telehealth delivery: videoconferencing and telephone consultations. As primary care organisations, Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) rapidly adopted telehealth consultations to maintain the delivery of primary care services to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the implementation (specifically the uptake, acceptability and requirements for delivery) of telehealth primary healthcare services for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples by a rural ACCHO during COVID-19. Methods: A single-site convergent-parallel mixed-methods study was undertaken in the context of an ongoing research partnership established between a rural ACCHO and a university department of rural health. De-identified health service data from March 2020 to March 2021 was extracted, including MBS telehealth consultations and client demographics (eg age, gender and postcode). Variables were analysed using descriptive statistics to examine the uptake of telehealth by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients. A geographical analysis of postcode data was also undertaken. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken concurrently with a purposive sample of health service personnel (including health professionals) involved in the implementation or delivery of telehealth, and Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander clients who had accessed telehealth, to explore the acceptability of telehealth and requirements for delivery. Thematic analysis using an inductive approach was undertaken. The analyses of quantitative and qualitative findings were merged to identify key concepts pertaining to the uptake, acceptability and requirements for telehealth delivery. Results: During the first year of implementation, 435 telehealth primary healthcare consultations were delivered to Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander clients. Seven health personnel and six Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander clients participated in interviews. Merged findings from an analysis of quantitative and qualitative data were grouped under three concepts: uptake of telehealth consultations by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients, maintaining the delivery of ACCHO services during COVID-19, and implications for sustaining telehealth in an ACCHO. Findings identified that telehealth maintained the delivery of ACCHO services to Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander clients across the lifespan during COVID-19, despite a preference for face-to-face consultations. A greater uptake of telephone consultations compared to videoconferencing was identified. Barriers to the utilisation of videoconferencing were largely technology related, highlighting the need for additional support for clients. Conclusion: Telehealth was a useful addition to face-to-face consultations when used in the appropriate context such as the administration of long-term medication prescriptions by a GP. Engaging the ACCHO sector in the policy discourse around telehealth is imperative for identifying requirements for ongoing implementation.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2023-11-22T04:40:03Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2024-02-02T00:52:52Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-02-02T00:52:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2023en
dc.titleImplementation of telehealth primary health care services in a rural Aboriginal community-controlled health organisation during the Covid-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleRural and Remote Healthen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume23en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue3en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage28en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage41en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusAUSTRALIAen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRURAL HEALTH SERVICESen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusTELEHEALTHen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusABORIGINAL COMMUNITY CONTROLLED HEALTH ORGANISATIONen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22605/RRH7521en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.