Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1803
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorKing, O.en_US
dc.contributorHowlett, O.en_US
dc.contributorClapham, Reneeen_US
dc.contributorVersace, Vincenten_US
dc.contributorWong Shee, Annaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-07T04:13:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-07T04:13:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.govdoc01752en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1803-
dc.description.abstractRural and regional areas need health service-led research that generates relevant translatable findings. Rural and regional health services have less access to research infrastructure and funding than their metropolitan counterparts, and therefore have comparatively less capacity to lead and participate in research. To address an identified gap, a research training program for rural and regionally-based allied health professionals (AHPs) was implemented. Training consisted of two face-to-face workshops held six weeks apart, with research mentoring between workshops to support novice AHP researchers develop a research protocol. The mixed method evaluation included three and 12-month post-training interviews. Through the interviews, we sought to understand whether the training and/or other factors influenced individual AHPs’ research capacity development and research progress, and to determine the training outcomes at the two time points. Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 AHPs, with 5 AHPs participating at both time points. Through thematic analysis, we identified three key themes: 1) valued learnings or new skills gleaned from the training; 2) outcomes of the training (expected and unexpected); and 3) factors influencing the progression of AHP-led health research (i.e., barriers and facilitators). Participants appreciated the practical nature of the research training and gained fundamental research skills, networks, and the impetus to commence a research project. Factors that influenced participants’ progress included organizational factors (e.g., manager support), time, team-based approaches, and support from experienced researchers. The findings of our evaluation have informed the development of a broader program of research capacity and capability building in rural and regional Victoria.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-08-31T00:49:39Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-10-07T04:13:08Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 NAHC_Olivia King_Research training.mp4: 13586171 bytes, checksum: 3173419f2662e379a3c59159e0b76b49 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-10-07T04:13:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 NAHC_Olivia King_Research training.mp4: 13586171 bytes, checksum: 3173419f2662e379a3c59159e0b76b49 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021en
dc.titleResearch training for rural and regional allied health professionals: An evaluation study.en_US
dc.typeConferenceen_US
dc.type.specifiedPaperen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencedateAugust 9-12en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencename14th National Allied Health Conference (NAHC)en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceOnlineen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRESEARCH TRAININGen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusALLIED HEALTHen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusREGIONALen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRURALen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
NAHC_Olivia King_Research training.mp4presentation13.27 MBUnknownView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.