Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1795
Title: Outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP): a multi-centre Australian registry.
Author: Yeoh, J.
Dinh, D.
Scully, T.
Brennan, A.
Reid, C.
Duffy, S.
Stub, D.
Freeman, M.
Sebastian, M.
Oqueli, Ernesto
Ajani, A.
Toner, L.
Hamilton, G.
Picardo, S.
Horrigan, M.
Yudi, M.
Farouque, O.
Seevanayagam, S.
Clark, D.
Issue Date: 2021
Conference Name: 69th CSANZ Annual Scientific Meeting 43rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Heart Research ANZET 21
Conference Date: August 4-7
Conference Place: Online
Abstract: Background: Patients with severe coronary artery disease with a clinical indication for revascularisation but who are at high procedural risk are potentially underserved and understudied. Advances in current percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques and technology, in addition to appropriate patient selection may help treat such patients. The relative frequency and outcomes following PCI in these high-risk patients are not well known. Objective: We report the early and long-term mortality of PCI for patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP). Methods: Patients from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry between 2005 and 2018 undergoing CHIP were compared to non-CHIP. CHIP was defined as those with a left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, having one anatomical feature such as left main coronary artery PCI, American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) B2/C lesion, multivessel disease, or chronic total occlusion in addition to three or more of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, diabetes, kidney failure, age ≥75, and peripheral vascular disease. Long-term mortality was obtained by National Death Index linkage. Results: 20,973 procedures were included. Conclusion: In this multicentre registry, the proportion of patients undergoing CHIP is very low. Despite good procedural success and reasonable in-hospital outcomes, long-term mortality is poor. Further research into patient selection and the benefits of CHIP compared to those treated medically should be considered.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1795
Internal ID Number: 01758
Health Subject: PCI
CARDIOLOGY
HIGH RISK PROCEDURES
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
Type: Conference
Paper
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.