Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1720
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSecombe, P.en_US
dc.contributorBrown, A.en_US
dc.contributorBailey, M.en_US
dc.contributorLitton, E.en_US
dc.contributorPilcher, D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-07T21:31:53Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-07T21:31:53Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.govdoc01674en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1720-
dc.descriptionIncludes data from BHSen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to regional and rural intensive care units (ICUs). Design, setting and participants: Retrospective database review using the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database for admissions between January 2009 and June 2019. Characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to regional and rural ICUs were compared with metropolitan and tertiary ICUs. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included patient characteristics, ICU mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation and need for interhospital transfer. Results: Over the sampling period, admissions to regional/ rural ICUs averaged nearly 19 000 episodes per annum and comprised 20% of critical care admissions in Australia. Unadjusted mortality was lower, a result that persisted after adjustment for a range of confounders (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.80; P < 0.01). Admissions are more likely to be emergencies, and patients are more likely to live in areas of relative disadvantage and to require interhospital transfer, but are less likely to require mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: Although illness severity is lower for patients admitted to regional/rural ICUs, hospital mortality after adjustment for a range of confounders is lower. Compared with tertiary ICUs, emergency admissions are more likely, which may have implications for surge capacity during pandemic illness, while mechanical ventilation is less frequently required. Regional/rural ICUs provide care to a substantial proportion of critically ill patients and have a crucial role in the support of regional Australians.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-01-07T21:18:13Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-01-07T21:31:53Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-01-07T21:31:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2020en
dc.titleCharacteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to regional and rural intensive care units in Australia.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleCritical Care and Resuscitationen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume22en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue4en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage335en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage343en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusICUen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusINTENSIVE CARE UNITen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusREGIONAL HOSPITALSen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.