Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1681
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorWynn, Jessen_US
dc.contributorDodds, Lachlanen_US
dc.contributorJohns-Putra, Lydiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-06T05:06:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-06T05:06:17Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.govdoc01637en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1681-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction & Objectives: Worldwide, only 10-15% of urologists are female. This workforce discrepancy may have an effect on patient choices and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate patient preferences for the gender of their treating urologist and associated underlying reasons. Materials & Methods: 400 structured face-to-face interviews were conducted in urology outpatient clinics. Patient gender, age, presenting complaint and whether patients considered their condition to be embarrassing or not were recorded. These were correlated with patient preferences for urologist gender in four different scenarios: consultation; physical examination; office-based procedure; and surgery. Patients with a gender preference received a follow-up telephone interview. Results: There were 329 (82.3%) male patients and 71 (17.7%) female patients interviewed. 345 (86.3%) patients considered their condition embarrassing. The number of patients with a gender preference were 63 (15.7%) for consultation, 108 (27.0%) for physical examination, 89 (22.3%) for office-based procedure and 29 (7.0%) for surgery. For all scenarios, patients who considered their condition embarrassing were more likely to have a preference and, for all scenarios except surgery, female patients were more likely to have a preference. Preferences were gender concordant in 50/63 (79.4 %) patients for consultation, 95/108 (88.0%) for physical examination, 78/89 (87.6%) for office-based procedure and 21/29 (72.4 %) for surgery. For all scenarios except surgery, female patients were more likely to have a gender-concordant preference. Patients were more likely to change their mind if they saw a urologist of opposite gender to their preference. Conclusions: Female patients and those with a perceived embarrassing condition were more likely to have a gender preference, with most preferences being gender-concordant. Preferences were more likely in the scenarios of physical examination and office-based procedure and less so for surgery. Better understanding of reasons for gender preference in this small, but important, subset of patients will assist patient education, reduce barriers to healthcare access and improve healthcare provision.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-01-05T22:29:39Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2021-01-06T05:06:17Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-01-06T05:06:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2020en
dc.titlePatient preferences for the gender of their treating urologist.en_US
dc.typeConferenceen_US
dc.type.specifiedPaperen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencedateJuly 17-19en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameEuropean Association of Urology Virtual Congressen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceOnlineen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusUROLOGISTen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusGENDERen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusPATIENT PREFERENCESen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.