Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1282
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorWong Shee, Annaen_US
dc.contributorNagle, Cateen_US
dc.contributorCorboy, Deniseen_US
dc.contributorVersace, Vincenten_US
dc.contributorRobertson, Carolynen_US
dc.contributorFrawley, Natashaen_US
dc.contributorMcKenzie, AnneMarieen_US
dc.contributorLodge, Julieen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-21T03:37:22Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-21T03:37:22Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.govdoc01219en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/1282-
dc.description.abstractObjective Prior to implementation of a Normal Labour and Birth Bundle (NLBB) at a regional maternity service in Victoria, Australia, this study aimed to understand clinician factors that may influence the uptake, acceptance and use of the NLBB. Design This was a mixed methods study in which The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) provided the framework for the conduct and analysis of the staff survey and focus groups. Descriptive and multiple regression were used to analyse the survey data and thematic analysis was used for the focus group data. Participants Participants for the survey and focus groups included clinicians providing publicly funded care and management of labour for women birthing at the health service. Maternity care clinicians were invited to participate in both the survey and the focus groups. Findings Seventy-six clinicians (88.8%) responded to the survey. Mean scores for TPB constructs were well above the mid-scale score of 4, indicating strong positive attitudes, high levels of self-efficacy and positive social pressure to use the NLBB and strong intentions to use it in the future. Self-efficacy was the strongest independent predictor (β = 0.45, p < 0.001) of intention to use the NLBB (overall model R2=0.38). A valued consequence of implementing standardised and objective guidelines, highlighted in the focus groups, was the positive impact on clinicians’ confidence in their decision-making. Key conclusions This study found that midwives and obstetricians were in favour of using a normal labour and birth care bundle and perceived the bundle to align with the expectations of work colleagues and the women they care for. The findings of this study show that clinicians at the health service had strong intentions to use the normal labour and birth care bundle in the future. Implications for practice Implementation science is important in embedding and sustaining practice change. Understanding staff perceptions is an essential first step of this process.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2019-02-05T00:50:09Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2019-02-21T03:37:22Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-02-21T03:37:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2019en
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.005en_US
dc.titleImplementing an intervention to promote normal labour and birth: A study of clinicians’ perceptions.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.specifiedArticleen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleMidwifery.en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume70en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage46en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage53en_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusPHYSIOLOGICAL BIRTHen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusCAESAREAN SECTIONen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusMIDWIFERYen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusTHEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOURen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusFOCUS GROUPSen_US
dc.subject.healththesaurusRURAL MATERNITY SERVICEen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.