Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1112
Title: | Thermo-expandable prostatic stents for bladder outlet obstruction in the frail and elderly population: an underutilized procedure? |
Author: | Sethi, Kapil Bozin, Michael Jabane, Tebogo McMullin, Richard Cook, David Forsyth, Rob Dodds, Lachlan Johns-Putra, Lydia |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
Publication Title: | Investigative and Clinical Urology |
Volume: | 58 |
Issue: | 6 |
Start Page: | 447 |
End Page: | 452 |
Abstract: | Purpose: To report our outcomes with the use of a thermo-expandable metallic intraprostatic stent (Memokath) for patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) secondary to prostatic obstruction, and to assess it is a feasible option for many frail and elderly men unsuitable for surgery. We reviewed patients who underwent insertion of a Memokath stent for BOO over 17 years (January 1999 to December 2015) at one regional center over a long follow-up period (median, 7 years). Patients were selected if they had obstructive urinary symptoms or urinary retention with an indwelling catheter in situ, and were ineligible for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) under general or spinal anesthesia. Primary outcomes assessed were the improvement in urinary symptoms and voiding parameters, as well as the ability to void spontaneously if catheterized, along with complications. One hundred forty-four patients who presented with BOO or urinary retention had a Memokath stent inserted. Ninety patients (62.5%) had a successful stent insertion with a significant difference between the median preoperative (550 mL) and postoperative residual volume (80 mL, p<0.0001). Nearly two-thirds of men (64%) returned to unassisted voiding with no increased risk of complications over time. Fifty-four patients (37.5%) experienced stent failure. Main complications requiring stent removal or repositioning were migration, occlusion, refractory urinary retention and irritative voiding symptoms. In elderly and frail men with BOO deemed unsuitable to undergo TURP, prostatic stent is a safe and practical alternative to long-term catheterization. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1112 |
Resource Link: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29124245 |
ISSN: | 2466-0493 |
DOI: | 10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.447 |
Internal ID Number: | 01108 |
Health Subject: | AGED TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE URINARY BLADDER NECK OBSTRUCTION PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA URINARY RETENTION PROSTATE CATHETERS, INDWELLING FOLLOW-UP STUDIES URINARY CATHETERIZATION URETHRAL OBSTRUCTION STENTS |
Type: | Journal Article Article |
Appears in Collections: | Research Output |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.