Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/906
Title: Associations and clinical significance in meta-analysis: when are the deductions too presumptive?
Authors: MacFadyen, Robert J.
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
Place of publication: Edinburgh, Scotland
Journal title: The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
Volume: 44
Issue: 2
Start Page: 131
End Page: 132
Abstract: Commentary on the conclusions reached in a systematic review and meta-analyis of publications carried out over an approximately ten-year period from 2002-2012 looking at mortality after coronary presentation. The article discussed is Sorita, A., Ahmed A., Starr, S et al. (2014) Off hour presentation and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2014;348:f7393.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/906
metadata.dc.relation.uri: https://www.rcpe.ac.uk/Journal/associations-and-clinical-significance-metaanalysis-when-are-deductions-too-presumptive
ISSN: 1478-2715
Internal ID Number: 00840
Health Subject: AFTER HOURS CARE - ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATON
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
HEALTH POLICY
HEALTH RESOURCES
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
MYOCRDIAL REPERFUSION
Type: Journal Article
Article
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RMacFadyen_Associations and clinical significance ....pdf179.84 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.