Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/657
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIronfield, Craig M.en
dc.contributor.authorBarrington, Michael J.en
dc.contributor.authorKluger, Romanen
dc.contributor.authorSites, Brianen
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-27T04:34:46Zen
dc.date.available2015-04-27T04:34:46Zen
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.govdoc00639en
dc.identifier.issn1098-7339en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11054/657en
dc.description.abstractThe article includes data from Ballarat Health Services. Introduction: Peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) is associated with superior outcomes compared with opioids; however, little is known regarding patients’ perceptions of the care they have received. Patient satisfaction is emerging as an important indicator of quality of health care, and identifying deficiencies in discrete aspects of satisfaction may allow targeted interventions to improve quality. In this study, we analyze data relevant to patient satisfaction from the International Registry of Regional Anesthesia. The primary objective of this analysis was to report the results of a patient-satisfaction questionnaire and to determine predictors associated with unwillingness to have PNB repeated in the case of future surgery. Methods: The questionnaire used in this study was derived from this registry’s results and from previously validated questionnaires and addressed 3 domains of importance, namely, provision of information, pain, and interaction with the anesthesiologist. The 11-item written, multidimensional questionnaire was given to patients within 2 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was willingness to have PNB repeated in the event of future similar surgery. Results: Data related to 9969 surgical procedures were collected between July 1, 2011, and March 31, 2013. The survey response rate was 61.6%. Most respondents—94.6% (95% confidence interval, 94.0%–95.1%)—stated that they were willing to have a repeat PNB. Ninety percent of respondents were satisfied or completely satisfied with the information provided about the nerve block, as well as the anesthesiologist-patient interaction. Patients who were dissatisfied with either of these domains (ie, information provision or professional interaction) were less willing to undergo repeat PNB, as were patients who reported significant pain during the nerve block procedure. Conclusions: A high proportion of survey respondents were willing to undergo repeat PNB in case of future surgery and were satisfied with their anesthetic care. Targeted interventions to improve quality of PNB should be aimed at improving comfort, information provision, and physician-patient interaction.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2015-04-27T04:34:33Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Gemma Siemensma (gemmas@bhs.org.au) on 2015-04-27T04:34:46Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-04-27T04:34:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2014en
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen
dc.titleAre patients satisfied after peripheral nerve blockade? Results from an international registry of regional anesthesia.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.specifiedArticleen
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicineen
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume39en
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1en
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage48en
dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage55en
dc.subject.healththesaurusPERIPHERAL NERVE BLOCKen
dc.subject.healththesaurusPATIENT QUESTIONNAIREen
dc.subject.healththesaurusPATIENT SATISFACTIONen
dc.date.issuedbrowse2014-01-01en
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.