Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Using hospital standardised mortality ratios to assess quality of care - proceed with extreme caution.|
|Authors:||Scott, Ian A.|
Brand, Caroline A.
Phelps, Grant E.
Barker, Anna L.
Cameron, Peter A.
|Publisher:||AMPCo Australasian Medical Publishing Company|
|Place of publication:||Strawberry Hills, NSW|
|Journal title:||Medical Journal of Australia|
|Abstract:||Australian Health Ministers have endorsed the hospital standardised mortality ratio (HMSR) as a key indicator of quality and safety, and efforts are currently underway towards national implementation. In the UK, Canada, the Netherlands and the US, the HSMR has been used for several years within organisations to monitor performance and response to quality and safety programs. In the UK and Canada the HSMR is publicyl reported and used to compare performances between hospitals. The validity and reliability of the HSRM as a tool for distinguishing low-quality from high-quality hospitals remain in doubt, and it has not been proven that HSMR reporting leads to worthwhile improvement in quality of care and patient outcomes. Institutions may respond to an unfavourable HSMR by "gaming" administrative data and risk-adjustment models or implementing inappropriate changes to care. Despite its apparent low cost and ease of measurement the HSMR is currently not "fit for purpose" as a screening tool for detecting low-quality hospitals and should not be used in making comparisons. It may be better to monitor changes in outcomes over time within individual institutions.|
|Internal ID Number:||00461|
|Health Subject:||QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE|
HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT
|Appears in Collections:||Research Output|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.