Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/199
Title: Reading systematic reviews.
Authors: Peach, Hedley G.
Issue Date: 2002
Publisher: Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
Place of publication: Melbourne
Publication Title: Australian Family Physician
Volume: 31
Issue: 8
Start Page: 736
End Page: 740
Abstract: BACKGROUND: While systematic reviews should be of assistance in decision making, currently many reviews are unreliable, poorly reported or not clinically useful. It is therefore important that they are read critically. OBJECTIVES: The objective is to provide a logical way to appraise systematic reviews. Particular objectives are to demonstrate how to use a validated general guide for appraising systematic reviews; amend the guide so that it can be used to appraise systematic reviews of controlled trials, prognostic studies and studies evaluating diagnostic tests; choose between discordant reviews and assess the usefulness of good systematic reviews. DISCUSSION: Guidelines for undertaking and reporting systematic reviews should eventually improve their quality and usefulness. In the meantime, reviews must be appraised critically, particularly those outside the Cochrane Library.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/199
Resource Link: http://www.racgp.org.au/afp/200208/24209
ISSN: 0300-8495
Internal ID Number: 00183
Health Subject: SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
RESEARCH
CRITICAL APPRAISAL
Type: Journal Article
Article
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AFP00183.pdfReproduced with permission from AFP142.52 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.