Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1285
Title: Impact of socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction.
Author: Biswas, Sinjini
Andrianopolous, Nick
Duffy, Stephen J.
Leftkovits, Jeffrey
Brennan, Angela
Walton, Antony
Chan, William
Noaman, Samer
Shaw, James A.
Ajani, Andrew
Clark, David J.
Freeman, Melanie
Hiew, Chin
Oquieli, Ernesto
Reid, Christopher M.
Stub, Dion
Issue Date: 2019
Publication Title: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes.
Volume: 12
Issue: 1
Start Page: 1
End Page: 10
Abstract: Background: Low socioeconomic status (SES) has been previously shown to be associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. However, unlike in Australia, many of these studies have been performed in countries without universal healthcare where SES may be expected to have a greater impact on care and outcomes. We sought to determine whether there is an association between SES and baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes and use of secondary prevention therapy in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and Results: We prospectively collected data on 5665 consecutive ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction PCI patients between 2005 and 2015 from 6 government-funded hospitals participating in a multicenter registry. Patients were categorized into SES quintiles using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage system, a score allocated to each residential postcode based on factors like income, educational level, and employment status by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. In our study, lower SES patients were more likely to have diabetes mellitus, smoke, and initially present to a non-PCI capable hospital (all P≤0.01). Among primary PCI patients, the median time to reperfusion was slightly higher in lower SES groups (211 [144–337] versus 193 [145–285] minutes, P<0.001). Drug-eluting stent use was higher in the higher SES groups (P<0.001). At 12 months after PCI, lower SES patients had higher rates of ongoing smoking and lower use of guideline-recommended secondary prevention therapy (both P<0.01). Despite these differences, SES group was not found to be an independent predictor of 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events. Conclusions: Lower SES patients have more comorbidities and experienced slightly longer reperfusion times but otherwise similar care. Despite these baseline differences, clinical outcomes after ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction PCI were similar regardless of SES.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11054/1285
Resource Link: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004979
Internal ID Number: 01224
Health Subject: EPIDEMIOLOGY
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
SECONDARY PREVENTION
Type: Journal Article
Article
Appears in Collections:Research Output

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.